In which state has the production of rice increased continuously over the years?

Production of rice in different years by all states together:
2000 ? 1500 + 1250 + 1160 + 1520 + 1440 + 1600 = 8470 tonnes
2004 ? 1480 + 1190 + 1190 + 1500 + 1350 + 1620 = 8330 tonnes
2005 ? 1620 + 1400 + 1310 + 1480 + 1430 + 1510 = 8750 tonnes
2006 ? 1700 + 1450 + 1300 + 1590 + 1280 + 1610 = 8930 tonnes
2007 ? 1540 + 1320 + 1340 + 1630 + 1380 + 1580 = 8790 tonnes
2008 ? 1650 + 1380 + 1360 + 1580 + 1400 + 1590 = 8960 tonnes
Hence, in year 2008 the production of rice was the highest.

Average quantity of rice produced by state D = 9300/6 = 1550 tonnes
Average quantity of rice produced by state F = 9510/6 = 1585 tonne
Hence, required ratio = 1550 : 1585 = 310 : 317

As per given Table graph,
Rice produced by state C in years 2006 = 1300
Rice produced by state A in years 2006 = 1700
Required percentage = 1300 x 100 /1700 = 76.47% ? 76%

Production of rice by different states over the years:
A ? 1500 + 1480 + 1620 + 1700 + 1540 + 1650 = 9490 tonnes
B ? 1250 + 1190 + 1400 + 1450 + 1320 + 1380 = 7990 tonnes
C ? 1160 + 1190 + 1310 + 1300 + 1340 +1360 = 7660 tonnes
D ? 1520 + 1500 + 1480 + 1590 + 1630 + 1580 = 9300 tonnes
E ? 1440 + 1350 + 1430 + 1280 + 1380 + 1400 = 8280 tonnes
F ? 1600 + 1620 + 1510 + 1610 + 1580 + 1590 = 9510 tonnes
Hence, the state C produced the lowest quantity of rice.

Total number of employees working in organisation B = 1015 + 960 + 1384 + 1545 + 745 + 54 = 5703
Number of employee working in finance department = 960
Required percentage = 960 x 100 /5703 = 16.83% ? 17%

According to the table in the research and development department number of employees remained nearly same during the year from 2003 to 2008.

It is clear from the table that it was the year 2007 when the number of employees working in each department was more than that in the previous year and nearly equal to next year.

Number of total employees in 2003 = 150 + 25 + 50 + 45 + 75 = 345
? Percentage number of employees working in production deptt . = 150 x 100/345 = 43.48%
Number of total employees in 2004 = 225 + 40 + 45 + 62 + 70 = 442
? Percentage number of employees working in production deptt. = 225 x 100/442 = 50.9%
Number of total employees in 2005 = 450 + 65 + 30 + 90+ 73 = 708
? Percentage number of employees working in proudction deptt. = 450 x 100/708 = 63.56%
Total number of employees in 2006 = 470 + 73 + 32 + 105 + 70 = 750
? Percentage number of employees working in production deptt. = 470 x 100/750 = 60.67%
Total number of employees in 2007 = 500 + 80 + 35 +132 + 74 = 821
? Percentage number of employees working in production deptt, = 500 x 100/821 = 60.9%
Total number of employees in 2008 = 505 + 75 + 36 + 130 + 75 = 821
? Percentage number of employees working in production in deptt. = 505 x 100/821 = 61.5%
Hence, it is clear that percentage number of employees working in production deptt. was less then 50% in 2003

Production

Total number of employees in 2003 = Employees of (Production deptt.+ Sales deptt.+ Procurement deptt.+ Administration & Accounts deptt. + Research & Development deptt.)
Total number of employees in 2003 =150 + 25 + 50 + 45 + 75 = 345
Total number of employees in 2005 = (Production deptt.+ Sales deptt.+ Procurement deptt.+ Administration & Accounts deptt.+ Research & Development deptt.)
Total number of employees in 2005 = 450 + 65 + 30 + 90+ 73 = 708
Hence, it was the year 2005 when total number of employees in the factory became nearly double the total number of employees working in the factory during 2003.